@Free Ebook õ The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein ⚡ eBook or E-pub free

Now this is like it.Peter Ackroyd makes Victor Frankenstein a student at Cambridge, which enables Victor to make the acquaintance of Percy Bysshe Shelley and his various associates, including a certain Mary Godwin, and also lets Ackroyd find a way to shift the bulk of the action to his own home turf, London There s an interestingly Dickensian overtone at times Ackroyd s narrative is substantial, but poised, without waste and enriched with excellent secondary characters, real and fictional The horrors, once they start unfolding, are truly creepy few things I ve read lately are as chilling as the resurrection scene here The climax or crux of the story is unexpected and satisfying Certainly one of Ackroyd s better efforts in recent times I d even say that he s back in form now, after the post Milton In America slump. What would ve happened if Dr Frankenstein had actually lived and knew the Shelleys That s the question that Peter Ackroyd answers in this book.Frankenstein travels to study at Oxford where he meets Percy Shelley The two hit it off and become friends What then follows is a commingling of Shelley s life with the story of Frankenstein It s a surprising good book, and does seem to play a little with the opinion by some that Mary Shelley did not write Frankenstein Some people believe it was Percy.As per Ackroyd, the book is not 100% historically accurate It s not meant to be If you are looking for the Claire Claremont Percy Shelley Mary Shelley triangle here, you re not going to find it Godwin s second wife does not make an appearance in this book Claire s ghost phobia is instead attached to Mary As an aside, am I the only person who wonders what was on those diary pages that Mary tore out Who wonders why Claire and Percy traveled alone together Additionally, the story of Harriet Shelley s first wife is different Or is it The ghost story challenge, however, is still present.Ackroyd, as always, does a good job of getting his characters right Shelley feels like one wonder imagine Shelley to feel, as does Mary and Byron, and Polidori Ackroyd does a wonderful job of getting into character Frankenstein feels like Shelley s creation Because of the change in times, Ackroyd s book is terrifying or terrifying in a different way He is able to provide detail that Mary Shelley could not He also throws in questions of reality and madness This book is a worthy take and companion to Frankenstein. @Free Ebook õ The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein À When Two Nineteenth Century Oxford Students Victor Frankenstein, A Serious Researcher, And The Poet Percy Bysshe Shelley Form An Unlikely Friendship, The Result Is A Tour De Force That Could Only Come From One Of The World S Most Accomplished And Prolific Authors This Haunting And Atmospheric Novel Opens With A Heated Discussion, As Shelley Challenges The Conventionally Religious Frankenstein To Consider His Atheistic Notions Of Creation And Life Afterward, These Concepts Become An Obsession For The Young Scientist As Victor Begins Conducting Anatomical Experiments To Reanimate The Dead, He At First Uses Corpses Supplied By The Coroner But These Specimens Prove Imperfect For Victor S Purposes Moving His Makeshift Laboratory To A Deserted Pottery Factory In Limehouse, He Makes Contact With The Doomsday Men The Resurrectionists Whose Grisly Methods Put Frankenstein In Great Danger As He Works Feverishly To Bring Life To The Terrifying Creature That Will Bear His Name For Eternity Filled With Literary Lights Of The Day Such As Bysshe Shelley, Godwin, Lord Byron, And Mary Shelley Herself, And Penned In Period Perfect Prose, The Casebook Of Victor Frankenstein Is Sure To Become A Classic Of The Twenty First Century Have you ever read a book and have just been entirely unsure as to why the author decided to take the time to write it That s pretty much how I feel aboutThe Casebook of Victor Frankensteinby Peter Ackroyd A slightly adjusted retelling of the Frankenstein story by Mary Shelley, the novel does little to improve or grow upon the original story Essentially, Victor Frankenstein, a young scholar from Switzerland, enrolls in Oxford, where he meets the revolutionary poet Percy Bysshe Shelley Consumed with a drive to test the boundaries of life and the Divine, Frankenstein obtains a series of bodies through London s resurrection men and creates the famous monster that we all know and love While Ackroyd makes use of the different setting to introduce Frankenstein to the likes of the Shelleys and Lord Byron, I still can t see the point of this book The original works in so many ways why even bother to create what is essentially a remake Granted, it takes a historian like Ackroyd to make London come alive as it does in this novel The city has so many sides, so many mysteries, that it is a perfect character for any and all period novels Still, it is a pale imitation of something that has already been perfect for years I don t like to say that any work of art is a waste of time, but do yourself a favor and pick up the originalFrankensteinYou ll never get those hours back if you waste them on this one. Rewriting a Classic Review from 2011 I sat quite still and observed the heavens revolving above my head, and wondered if they were the origin of my being Or had I come from the creeping waters of the river Or from the mild earth that nurtured all the plants and flowers of the world When at first light a wood pigeon came before me, I took part in its existence and pecked upon the ground when a gull flew above my head I shared its soaring form wen I watched an otter upon the bank, I could feel the sleekness of its limbs In all creatures now I felt the force of one life, a life I shared, of which the principles were energy and joy. Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus in 1818, and it stands as a classic marker of the intersection between the Romantic and Industrial Ages The most superficial aspect of her idea a being created from human corpses by the use of electricity that turns out to be a monster has been transformed by Hollywood into a clich of the horror genre Yet Mary Shelley s original work has profound moral and philosophical implications that shed a great deal of light on the thought of the time, and are relevant in many respects to debates in our own age, such as cloning and stem cell research Peter Ackroyd s retelling of the story might seem superfluous, except that for modern readers it manages to cut even closer to the heart of what made the original novel so important, not least in its pitch perfect evocation of early 19th century style and intellectual portrait of the age.What Ackroyd is essentially writing about is the genesis of Frankenstein, and the intellectual climate which gave it birth The book is presented as the first person narration of Frankenstein himself, a cultured gentleman from the Mont Blanc region who comes to study at Oxford University and there meets Percy Bysshe Shelley The two become close friends and Victor later meets many members of the atheist and agnostic circles in which Shelley occasionally moved, his two wives Harriet Westwood and Mary Woolstonecraft Godwin , and literary personages such as Lord Byron and the shadowy John Polidori, who is credited as the author of the first vampire story Frankenstein s studies are originally philosophical, into the origin, nature, and meaning of life, but they soon take a practical turn as he explores whether the newly discovered electrical fluid might be the source of all energy, and thus be harnessed in the conquest of death.As Mary Shelley had done, Ackroyd brings Frankenstein and the monster together again for the creature to tell his story This is a passage of extraordinary beauty, as the opening quotation should show, in which the creature goes through the process of human learning with astonishing rapidity Like a second Caliban, he looks on life from a perspective largely free from conventions of social and religious morality, but he goes far beyond Caliban in his appreciation of abstract philosophy The apparent disconnect between the purity of the creature s mind and the deformity of his body may surprise some readers, but it will become important later.Ackroyd differs from Shelley in that his Frankenstein only revives a recently deceased corpse there is no thought of new creation His story is concentrated in space and time, and less melodramatic He also takes several liberties with history most of the events concerning real life people did indeed take place, but Ackroyd freely shifts them around by a year or so here and there, and suggests different circumstances for known events such as the drowning of Shelley s first wife But those who are prepared to read the novel as something than a simple retelling of Mary Shelley s original or a book of history will find a work of some depth that is entirely true to the essence of its period, besides being a rattling tale of Gothic adventure And nowhere does Ackroyd depart significantly from the original than in his astounding but carefully prepared conclusion but that would be telling As a former art historian whose specialty was the Romantic period, I take a particular interest in Ackroyd s insights In one scene, for example, Frankenstein and the Shelleys are sailing up the Rhine, looking at the rugged mounts, and crags, and precipices, where castles had been erected among the rocks and torrents Bysshe takes the anarchist point of view There is tyranny visible Every stone is fashioned out of blood It is built upon foundations of suffering Mary, however, contradicts him The spirit of this place is friendly than you suppose, Bysshe It is intimate with humankind Do you not see How much harmonious than those mountain peaks and abysses you praise so highly This landscape is touched by the human spirit A perfect summation of this particular landscape and its many reflections in the Romantic imagination And, in the balance of Gothic wildness and the touch of the human spirit, a beautiful symbol of the essence of Ackroyd s book Such as the Rhine paintings by Turner I have been studying lately 2017. Algo lento, y con un principio bastante tedioso, el libro mejora bastante en su tercio final Aun asi, lectura prescindible y olvidable, solo recomendada si no se tiene nada mejor a mano How do you feel about things that go bump in the night Me, not so good I am a coward I am Chief Coward from Cowardville I avoid scary movies and scary books and scary people too Soas much I was looking forward to reading Peter Ackroyd s new book The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein the F word frightened me off a bit But then the lure was too strong and I caved.In this retelling of Frankenstein on that famous ghost story filled night when Mr and Mrs Shelley were staying with Byron and Mary thought up her monster, the monster was already there Ackroyd places Victor Frankenstein among the guests Frankenstein and Shelley are old friends having gone Oxford together For all the visits the novel gets from the great men of the age, it s Victor s God playing life that is center stage.Frankenstein s obsession to create a new man, a perfect man does and doesn t happen He is of course able to give life to his corpse but it is a Monster he has created Frankenstein isn t the only one in this new family who is disappointed The Monster blames his creator for his unhappiness and cruelly destructive behavior Not much new there What Ackroyd does make new or at least brings back to the forefront is the tragedy of Mary Shelley s story While Casebook didn t have the appeal for me that other Ackroyd novels have like Chatterton and Dan Lemo and the Limehouse Golem or his amazing biographies of Charles Dickens and Thomas More, it is a very interesting book It has Ackroyd s trade mark attention to research and literary references Peter Ackroyd does make you smarter, but this time a little less fulfilled as well. Initially, I found it difficult to get into a reading rhythm with this book, but once I did, I found in completely engaging This is a retelling of Shelley s horror classic, and the author has made liberal use of real life figures, such as Lord Byron, Polidori, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and, of course, Mary Shelley herself.Phenomenally descriptive, many passages read like poetry this author is a master at setting scene, and one is able to visualize, and almost smell, the dark, filthy streets of London where much of the action takes place He vividly describes the reanimated creature and infuses him with an intelligence and vulnerability that make the reader sympathetic to his plight, in spite of his destructive actions, and render him likeable.Frankenstein himself is a man obsessed with the discovery of a controllable electrical power that will enable him to create life, and, subsequently, to destroy it Awareness of this might have given some foreshadowing of the ending thus, I was not completely surprised, but rather experienced an Of course, that s where it had to go feeling, and a sense of delight at its perfect crafting.Needless to say, this novel bears virtually no resemblance to the 1931 film I haven t read Shelley s original, but plan to I am also anxious to read of this highly acclaimed and awarded author s work. There is no joy without its attendant pain.Despite the above citation, this was fun than exemplary Ackroyd flips the Frankenstein myth with panache The good doctor hangs out with Shelley and Byron Science crackles, but only under the penumbra of abject poverty Mayhew reaches Freud and together pierce Gothic expectations There s less a Miltonic fall than a fissure. What if Frankenstein creates its own creature A surprisingly and great book by Peter Ackroyd with plenty of famous writers among the characters, like Mary Shelley, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Daniel Westbrook, Harriet Westbrook, John Polidori, Fred Shoebury, George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron.Hard to understand why this book has been underrated by some reviews.